AMD is competitive with Intel at a wide range of price points.Īlienware desktops are no stranger to unique design. Most games still don’t benefit from larger core counts, making the standard six-core Rya great starting place for a gaming PC. That’s why the option of mid-range Ryzen processors is more meaningful for AMD’s purposes. For gaming, though, save yourself some money. The gains in heavier tasks like video editing or 3D rendering are clear. I wasn’t able to test different configurations in this system, but from what I’ve seen in other tests, the extra cores of the 3950X don’t add much value in terms of gaming. That eight-core processor should provide most of what you need to keep your graphics card from bottlenecking. The real question, though, is whether you’ll see a significant difference between this and an affordable alternative like the Ryzen 7 3700X. Despite how pretty it is, the loud fans will make you want to hide it under your desk. While its cooling is efficient, the Aurora R10 is loud. Even better, if you have a 1440p monitor with a high refresh rate, you can play Assassin’s Creed Odyssey at Ultra High in 4K. The stand-out was Battlefield V, which handled 4K on Ultra at a silky smooth 76 FPS. Whether you want 60 FPS at 4K or 150 FPS at 1080p, the Aurora R10 can do it all. Gaming powerĬombined with the Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti for graphics, AMD’s Ryzen 9 3950X should guarantee the best framerates possible. The Ryzen 9 3950X is very nearly as quick as the Intel Core i9-9900K in single-core, and much quicker in multi-core, so you’re only gaining performance overall should you choose to make that upgrade. In the past, AMD has traded single-core performance for multi-core gains. That’s a hefty sum for no real gain in gaming performance. It charges around $50 extra for the Ryzen 9 3900X over the Core i9-9900K, and around $500 more for the 3950X. That means the jump up to twelve cores - or in this case, 16 cores - won’t always produce better framerates.Īlienware is counting cores, too. When it comes to gaming, r aw single-core power is still a more important factor. What’s all that mean? Well, it makes this Alienware one hell of a video editing machine. The 9900K has a maximum single-core frequency of 5GHz, while the Ryzen 9 3950X can’t wander north of 4.5GHz. In both Geekbench 4 and Cinebench, the 9900K is around 3% faster. Single core performance is a different story. We tested the Core i9-9900K in the Digital Storm Aventum X, and the Ryzen 9 3950X beat it by 32%. It runs circles around the Core i9-9900K, which has half the cores and threads. In both Cinebench and Geekbench, the 3950X obviously leans towards multi-core brilliance. Both are important, especially when you consider the difference in load between CPU-heavy tasks and gaming performance. I tested the processor at the heart of the new Aurora in benchmarks testing single core and multi-core performance. Cinebench r10 Pc#But if you want the absolute fastest, or want to use your PC for some content creation or other CPU-heavy tasks, 16 cores might intrigue you. If you thought the 12-core Ryzen 9 3900X was overkill, these four extra cores probably won’t do anything for you. It’s an incredible 16-core processor, the first of its type to appear in a “mainstream” gaming PC. The new Ryzen 9 3950X sits at the top of the stack, and the Aurora R10 is of the first systems to use it. That’s exactly what AMD and Alienware are going for.ĪMD is sneaking its way into more and more systems, especially where it can flex its multi-core muscles. Priced at $3,630 and pumped-up with a 16-core processor, this Ryzen-powered Aurora R10 will be overkill even for most gamers. The stereotypes have been thrown out the window, and the Aurora R10 is better for it. None of that used to be Alienware’s vibe.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |